A Case Filed Against Congress has once again stirred the political landscape of India, sparking debates on ethics, technology, and the limits of political criticism. The controversy arose when a 36-second AI-generated video was shared by the Bihar unit of the Congress party, depicting Prime Minister Narendra Modi in a distorted conversation with a figure resembling his late mother, Heeraben Modi.
This incident has deeply upset many, especially since it touches upon personal and emotional sentiments. The use of artificial intelligence in political campaigns is not new, but when technology is used in ways that question human dignity and respect, it naturally leads to widespread outrage. The Case Filed Against Congress brings to light not just legal implications but also moral questions about how far political rivalry should go.
Case Filed Against Congress Over AI Video Mocking
The Case Filed Against Congress began after a complaint was lodged by Sanket Gupta, convenor of the BJP Delhi Election Cell. The complaint was filed at the North Avenue police station in Delhi. According to Gupta, the AI video was defamatory, offensive to the dignity of Prime Minister Modi’s late mother, and disrespectful to motherhood in general.
The video, posted on X (formerly Twitter) on September 10, was marked as “AI GENERATED.” However, its portrayal of a personal conversation between PM Modi and his late mother was perceived as an emotional attack. For the BJP, this wasn’t just political criticism but a direct insult to the Prime Minister’s family.
The Case Filed Against Congress reflects growing concerns about AI misuse in politics. With elections approaching in Bihar, the timing of this video’s release is being seen as deliberate provocation.
Also Check: Landslides on Vaishno Devi Yatra Route
Congress Mocking AI Video on PM Modi and His Mother
At the heart of the Case Filed Against Congress lies the 36-second clip. In the video, PM Modi appears to be in a dreamlike state, speaking with a figure resembling Heeraben Modi. The distorted visuals give it a surreal and mocking tone, which many BJP leaders say crosses ethical boundaries.
The BJP argues that the video insults not only PM Modi but also the universal sentiment of motherhood. The Congress, however, defended itself by claiming that the video was satirical and not intended to disrespect anyone.
The very fact that the video was marked as “AI GENERATED” shows that technology was intentionally used to alter reality. This makes the Case Filed Against Congress an important moment in India’s political and legal history, as it raises new questions about whether AI-created satire should be protected as free speech or punished as defamation.
BJP’s Strong Reaction
The Case Filed Against Congress quickly escalated after BJP leaders condemned the video. According to the BJP, this is not the first time Congress has targeted PM Modi’s late mother. The complaint also referred to earlier incidents during the “Voter Adhikar Yatra” in Darbhanga on August 27-28, where Congress and RJD supporters allegedly raised slogans maligning PM Modi and Heeraben Modi.
For the BJP, these repeated attacks are part of a deliberate campaign to emotionally damage the Prime Minister. BJP leaders claim the video was not satire but an insult designed to provoke anger ahead of the Bihar elections.
The Case Filed Against Congress has thus turned into more than just a police complaint; it has become a rallying cry for BJP supporters who feel personal dignity has been attacked.
Also Read: Shubhanshu Shukla Meets PM Modi, Hands Over Space-Flown Tricolour
Congress’ Defense
While the BJP has strongly condemned the video, the Congress has tried to defend its position. According to the party, the clip was intended as satire and political commentary, not as an insult. They insist that no disrespect was meant toward PM Modi or his late mother.
Still, the Case Filed Against Congress puts the party in a difficult spot. In today’s digital age, even a single video can spread widely within minutes, shaping public perception. Even if Congress insists on satire, the emotional reaction from BJP supporters cannot be ignored.
The case highlights a bigger question: should political parties rely on such tools for criticism, or should there be clear boundaries on how AI is used in political discourse?
