Following controversy sparked by Congress leader Sam Pitroda’s comment, Prime Minister Narendra Modi asserted that the Indian populace won’t stand for discrimination based on skin color. Speaking at a gathering in Warangal, PM Modi called upon Rahul Gandhi, a prominent figure in the Congress party, to provide clarification.
PM Modi Slams Rahul Gandhi Over Skin Color Remarks
Prime Minister Narendra Modi criticized Rahul Gandhi, a Congress MP, for the controversial remarks made by party leader Sam Pitroda. Modi called Pitroda’s statement an insult to many people in India based on their skin color. Pitroda sparked controversy by suggesting that people in East India look like Chinese, while those in South India resemble Africans.
PM Modi expressed his anger during a rally in Telangana’s Warangal district, stating that he can handle insults directed at him but not at his people. He questioned whether one’s worth should be judged by their skin color, emphasizing that Indians, regardless of skin tone, worship Lord Krishna and uphold the Constitution.
The Prime Minister condemned the “shehzaada,” referring to Rahul Gandhi, for looking down on Indians based on their appearance and vowed not to tolerate such racist attitudes. He also mentioned efforts by the Congress to defeat President Droupadi Murmu, who comes from a tribal background.
Modi further criticized an unnamed “uncle” in America, supposedly advising Rahul Gandhi like a cricket umpire, suggesting a lack of independence in Gandhi’s decision-making.
Also Read: Delhi LG VK Saxena Recommends NIA Probe Against Arvind Kejriwal
PM Modi Calls for Unity Amidst Skin Color Controversy
Prime Minister Modi accused the Congress of opposing President Droupadi Murmu because of her skin color. He questioned why the Congress was so determined to defeat her, highlighting her strong reputation and Adivasi background.
Modi also criticized Sam Pitroda, whom he referred to as the “American uncle,” for making remarks about skin color. Pitroda had suggested that people from the North East resemble the Chinese, sparking controversy. However, Pitroda emphasized unity among people of diverse appearances, stating that despite differences, Indians have lived together peacefully for decades.
In summary, PM Modi criticized Congress for its stance on Droupadi Murmu and condemned Pitroda’s comments on skin color, emphasizing the importance of unity regardless of appearance.
Congress Responds
The BJP criticized Sam Pitroda’s comment as racist and divisive, saying it showed his limited understanding of India and its culture. According to BJP spokesperson Sudhanshu Trivedi, Pitroda suggested that since the Congress leadership came from foreign origins, they viewed Indians across the country as outsiders. This, Trivedi argued, reflects a clash over India’s identity.
He compared this mindset to that of the Mughals and British, who made Indians feel like foreigners in their own land. Meanwhile, the Congress denounced Pitroda’s analogies as unfortunate and unacceptable, with senior leader Jairam Ramesh distancing the party from them.
Also Read: Terrorist Attack on Convoy in Jammu and Kashmir, 5 Air Force Personnel Injured
PM Modi Slams Rahul Gandhi Over Skin Color Remarks FAQs
Q.1. What did Prime Minister Narendra Modi criticize Rahul Gandhi for?
Ans. Modi criticized Gandhi for controversial remarks on skin color made by Congress leader Sam Pitroda.
Q.2. Where did PM Modi express his anger over the remarks?
Ans. Modi expressed his anger during a rally in Telangana’s Warangal district.
Q.3. What did Modi emphasize regarding the worth of individuals?
Ans. Modi emphasized that one’s worth should not be judged by their skin color, highlighting India’s diverse worship practices and Constitution.
Q.4. Who did Prime Minister Modi refer to as the “shehzaada”?
Ans. Modi referred to Rahul Gandhi as the “shehzaada” during his criticism of discriminatory attitudes.
Q.5. What comparison did Modi draw regarding Congress’s stance on President Droupadi Murmu?
Ans. Modi criticized Congress for opposing President Droupadi Murmu, suggesting it was based on her skin color, despite her strong reputation and Adivasi background.
